Buscar
Academia, Género,
Derecho y Sexualidad.
Buscador
Palabras clave: 'Matrimonios entre homosexuales'.
19 coincidencia(s) encontradas.
Sobre la compatibilidad del matrimonio igualitario y las uniones de hecho entre personas del mismo sexo con el ordenamiento constitucional peruano
María Soledad Fernández Revoredo
2015
La doctora María Soledad Fernandez realiza una importante exposición de argumentos en torno a la compatibilidad entre el matrimonio y las uniones de hecho entre personas del mismo sexo con nuestra vigente Constitución. Así, la autora desarrolla cómo es que está entendida la orientación sexual en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico, concluyendo que cualquier trato diferenciado en este aspecto tiene que ser visto como una categoría sospechosa.
Posteriormente, se expone cómo es concebida la familia; así como las instituciones del matrimonio y unión de hecho, y su relación con la heterosexualidad. Finalmente, la autora llega a la conclusión que, en base a los principios recogidos en nuestra Constitución, realizando una lectura sistemática del mencionado texto, es posible aceptarjurídicamente el matrimonio y la unión de hecho entre personas del mismo sexo.
Matrimonio entre Parejas de un Mismo Sexo
Macarena Sáez, Hernán Corral Talciani, Rolando Jiménez, Marcela Virginia Rodríguez, Albie Sachs
AccederAcerca de la problemática de las uniones homosexuales: matrimonio y adopción
María Soledad Fernández Revoredo, Patrick McCarthy, Armando Nieto Vélez, Jose Miguel Sánchez Tomás
2007
AccederTransforming Family Law Through Same-sex Marriage: Lessons From (and To) the Western World
Macarena Sáez
AccederSame Sex Couples - Comparative Insights on Marriage and Cohabitation
Macarena Sáez
| Springer
This book shows six different realities of same-sex families. They range from full recognition of same-sex marriage to full invisibility of gay and lesbian individuals and their families. The broad spectrum of experiences presented in this book share some commonalities: in all of them legal scholars and civil society are moving legal boundaries or thinking of spaces within rigid legal systems for same-sex families to function. In all of them there have been legal claims to recognize the existence of same-sex families. The difference between them lies in the response of courts. Regardless of the type of legal system, when courts have viewed claims of same-sex couples and their families as problems of individual rights, they have responded with a constitutional narrative protecting same-sex couples and their families. When courts respond to these claims with rigid concepts of what a family is and what marriage is as if legal concepts where unmodifiable, same-sex couples have remained outside the protection of the law.
Until forty years ago marriage was the only union considered legitimate to form a family. Today more than 30 countries have granted rights to same sex couples, including several that have opened up marriage to couples of the same sex. Every day there is a new bill being discussed or a new claim being brought to courts seeking formal recognition of same sex couples. Not all countries are open to changing their legal structures to accommodate same-sex couples, but even those with no visible changes are witnessing new voices in their communities challenging the status quo and envisioning more flexible legal systems.
Same Sex- Marriage, Same-Sex Cohabitation, and Same-Sex Families Around the World: Why “Same” Is So Different?
Macarena Sáez
AccederLa cruzada contra el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en Colombia
Julieta Lemaitre Ripoll, Mauricio Albarracín
2006 | Center for Latin American & Latino Studies, American University, Washington
AccederIgualdad: el derecho al matrimonio de las parejas del mismo sexo
Esther Vicente
2014
El lunes 10 de noviembre de 2014 se llevó a cabo el Foro "Igualdad: el derecho al matrimonio de las parejas del mismo sexo" en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico. Los panelistas conversaron sobre la decisión del juez federal Hon. Juan Pérez-Giménez en el caso federal Conde v. Rius, los próximos trámites judiciales y el efecto de este caso en la normativa relacionada al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en Puerto Rico.
Este evento fue organizado por la Asociación Legal de Estudiantes Pro-Derechos LGBTT (ALEP) y la Federal Bar Association.
Moderadora:
Lcda. María Dolores Fernós López-Cepero
Orador principal:
Lcdo. Omar González Pagán (Organización Lambda Legal)
Comentaristas:
Lcda. Esther Vicente
Lcdo. Carlos E. Ramos González
Same-Sex Unions in Mexico: Between Text and Doctrine
Estefanía Vela Barba
2015
Currently Mexico recognizes same-sex marriage in several states. The
Mexican Supreme Court has been instrumental in this recognition, advancing an
interpretation of marriage outside its historical and textual interpretation. The
current state of same-sex marriage and LGBTI rights in general in Mexico is the
consequence of a new interpretation of the role of marriage and the family in the
Mexican society, as well as the evolution of the LGBTI movement.
Los criterios de la Corte sobre discriminación por estado marital: las piezas que faltan
Francisca Pou Giménez
2017 | Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas - UNAM
AccederEl derecho de familia interpelado por las uniones homosexuales
Verónica Spaventa
2009
AccederLas uniones homosexuales y la protección de la vivienda familiar
Verónica Spaventa
2007
AccederL'homoparentalité en Amérique Latine. Les vents qui soufflent du Sud
Eleonora Lamm, Marisa Herrera, Aida Kemelmajer de Carlucci
2012
AccederEl matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo en la reciente sentencia del TEDH. No se cierran puertas, mas sí se abren ventanas. CASO SCHALK Y KOPF c. AUSTRIA del 24 de junio de 2010
Eleonora Lamm
2011
AccederEl matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo: Un enfoque transformador o conformista?
Macarena Sáez
2018
AccederSame-Sex Marriage in the United States
Macarena Sáez
2015
This book shows six different realities of same-sex families. They range from full recognition of same-sex marriage to full invisibility of gay and lesbian individuals and their families. The broad spectrum of experiences presented in this book share some commonalities: in all of them legal scholars and civil society are moving legal boundaries or thinking of spaces within rigid legal systems for same-sex families to function. In all of them there have been legal claims to recognize the existence of same-sex families. The difference between them lies in the response of courts. Regardless of the type of legal system, when courts have viewed claims of same-sex couples and their families as problems of individual rights, they have responded with a constitutional narrative protecting same-sex couples and their families. When courts respond to these claims with rigid concepts of what a family is and what marriage is as if legal concepts where unmodifiable, same-sex couples have remained outside the protection of the law.
Until forty years ago marriage was the only union considered legitimate to form a family. Today more than 30 countries have granted rights to same sex couples, including several that have opened up marriage to couples of the same sex. Every day there is a new bill being discussed or a new claim being brought to courts seeking formal recognition of same sex couples. Not all countries are open to changing their legal structures to accommodate same-sex couples, but even those with no visible changes are witnessing new voices in their communities challenging the status quo and envisioning more flexible legal systems.